Friday, March 12, 2010

Julie (1975, Hindi - Lakshmi, Sridevi)

I’m really not sure how I made myself sit through two and a half hours of this boring and socially-regressive film! But it was made in the seventies, so I suppose I can’t be too harsh. My motivation for seeing it was the actress Lakshmi (also known as Laxmi) who was one of the South Indian beauties in my “Intro to Evergreen South Indian Cinema Stars” post. In her picture there, she looked like a classy, black-and-white era star, but her look in Julie is quite different! Here she wears short, western a-line skirts and looks like walking jailbait through most of the film. Her long, wavy hair is oh-so-seventies and her eyes huge and almond-shaped. From the very start of the film, it is obvious that she is the main attraction. Many of the men in the film leer and stare creepily at her, and shots often linger on her walking and are, frankly, sort of creepy too.


The film is a remake of the Malayalam film "Chattakari" and tells the story of Julie (Lakshmi), the oldest daughter in a dsyfunctional anglo-indian family living in India. The father (Om Prakash) is a bumbling, goofy drunk and the mother (Nadira) is an unhappy and temperamental woman conflicted by her mixed heritage.

I’ve never seen an Indian film about anglo-indians before which brought a somewhat interesting angle. The mother is constantly telling her children to not mix with or behave like the locals (Indians, Brahmins, etc.) and seems preoccupied with “keeping up with the joneses” in the anglo-indian community.

But really, that was a very small part of the film which is overall painfully long and full of boring scenes. Parts of the plot are not explained well which left me having zero sympathy for the characters and not giving a damn, frankly. The characters often react bizarrely to things and I thought Lakshmi’s acting was overly nervous throughout. There’s lots of WTF moments here!

*Spoilers*

So after what felt like eons of pointless scenes, Julie becomes smitten by Shashi, her friend Usha’s newly-returned older brother. The only thing I can think of when hearing that name is Shashi Kapoor, and this Shashi is certainly no cutie!

She ends up sleeping with him in a creepy “no means yes” scene/song and later finds herself pregnant (surprise!). We’re not sure how much later because big chunks of time pass in the film with absolutely no warning or explanation. When she goes to tell her lover of the bad news, she finds that his whole family has apparently moved and deserted the home. No explanation!

What happens next was completely and utterly INSANE. Julie breaks down and tells her mother she is pregnant. Predictably, her mother freaks out and decides that Julie is going to visit an auntie with the hopes of getting an abortion. The two leave and tell the rest of the family that Julie is going away to go get a job because they can’t support her anymore. The auntie then convinces Julie’s mom that abortion is a sin and the mother decides that Julie is going to stay there until she gives birth and then give the baby up in an orphanage.

Like, seriously. So Julie stays alone and hidden away at this aunty's house in order to save her family and community from the disgrace, apparently. When the mom returns after leaving Julie, she tells the family “oh Julie found a job so I left her there. Oh, and she can’t come back until she can get vacation time which will be in 7-8 months.” Ha! To add more icing on the cake, Julie’s father becomes terribly sick and dies. No one tells Julie of course; she doesn’t find out until her mother comes to visit her again after the baby is born, at which time the mom decides to add more salt to the wound by admitting to Julie that “your dad missed you a lot while on his deathbed.” Then there is a scene of copious tears where Julie is forced to leave her baby against her wishes and begs her mom for forgiveness. Gah.

Next, Shashi inexplicably returns suddenly, hears the news from Julie, and says he’ll be a good guy and marry her! But alas, more complications again when Shashi’s mom, an orthodox Brahmin, in hate of Julie and her Christian ways, decides to slyly tell her that marrying Shashi will make Usha unmarriable. But all is well again when Shashi’s sensible dad adopts the baby into their family and introduces it to Julie’s family while giving a lecture on how people shouldn’t get all worked up over religious or communal differences. Everyone is happy happy!

This film has lots of positive reviews online which I can only assume are written by people who saw it back in the 70s and are overly nostalgic and forgot about its obvious crappiness.

So now that that’s out of the way…here's some things I enjoyed:

Julie’s family are Christian anglo-indians, so they have a lit-up picture of Jesus Christ and a nativity scene in their house, and a party has a Christmas tree (so reminiscent of the one in Kaho Naa Pyaar Hai- is hanging balloons on Christmas trees an Indian trend?)!

In contrast, Usha's mother is an ultra-orthodox Brahmin Hindu who hates everything about Christians.




And SRIDEVI!!!! She is so young here! At first I thought "omg, was this her first film" but no- according to IMDB.com she had already been in around 30 films before this one... a veteran already! :)

Instead of us seeing Julie visibly pregnant, we first see this picture as the camera pans over to her pained expression! :D

And the instigator of this whole mess! ;)

And now for some healthy Laxmi pix-spamming!







13 comments:

  1. I promise to come back and read this properly, but for now let me just say how fabulous the images are! The way they've done the titles is very cool - I feel like I'm getting a real sense of that character (and wonder if she really IS like that in the film!) - and you KNOW I love the giant sunglasses in the umbrella picture :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. No picture of Jesus is complete without flashing lights!

    The story was quite inane, though I was glad to see that Sridevi had good comedic timing at such an early age.

    I had bought the film after watching the Kannada remake with Dino & Ramya which is a carbon copy. I was pleasantly suprised to see Lakshmi, who I had only seen playing grannies up to that point.

    Oh, and whilst the songs were OK, I liked the incredibly cheesy "My Heart is Beating" song.

    Wasn't Lakshmi in the Malayalam original?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Beth - Aren't the sunglasses great? They just don't make 'em like that anymore.

    piyaara - lol! Yes!! How could I forget that song? The way she dramatically rises from the table to start crooning such a craptastic melody is fabulous. Yes, Lakshmi was in the original- here's some songs from it!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mq8Ogz6we4E http://www.in.com/videos/watchvideo-narayanaya-nama-chattakkari-1974-p-leela-5847007.html

    ReplyDelete
  4. I haven't seen this but seen the Kannada version (the only reason I saw it is because of Dino Morea).Now, I have to watch the original :)

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks for this review, i've long been on the lookout for it, apparently as painful as it might sound, the film is said to be based on a true life story. Laxmi by the way was awarded the Filmfare Best Actress award, and the songs are beautiful, I LOVE the wonderful 'My heart is beating' & Dil kya kare, were the songs subtitles on your Eros Dvd

    ReplyDelete
  6. what actress is that on your blogger profile pic, i think i must have asked you before, i can't remember, kindly refresh my memory please

    ReplyDelete
  7. Nicki - It's hard for me to understand how this story could translate to the present day where the social atmosphere is completely different. But you know, if it has Dino, then... ;)

    bollywooddeewana - hello! Yes, her winning an award for this film was one of the reasons I wanted to see it, though I wasn't completely sold on her acting. That's interesting, if not sad, that it was supposedly based on a true story. For some reason I can't remember with 100% certainty if there were subtitles in the songs. I believe there were- I think I remember giggling at the translations in the "seduction" song. Yes, I'm almost positive there were subs! And my profile pic is of the luminous Shobana. :)

    ReplyDelete
  8. Apparently the original malaylam chatakari was more realistic in its portrayal of the cultural differences and perceptions (read prejudices) of the anglo indian and mainstream indian communities respectively. Vikram's mom's role is an indication of the typical behaviour of orthodox brahmins of Bengal and South India (concepts of purity etc - a hangover of old times). I think this is one of those films that does require some understanding of the Indian social dynamics to truly appreciate it. This is not to say that non indians don't appreciate this film or indian films - hope you take this in the right spirit and context.

    The original Malayalam version also had a realistic ending where julie actually dies. The hero decides to bring up their baby on learning (late of course in filmi style) about her death and the birth of their baby. Hindi audiences are most likely to appreciate a happy ending more. Hence the ending was changed in the hindi version.

    As Bollywooddeewana has said, the songs are melodious and enjoyable. This film was one of the super hits of the 70s. Of course we will find flaws in many old films when we view them now. Even I am guilty of that!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Thanks for your reply filmbuff. No offense taken- I do understand what you mean about outsiders not quite understanding the cultural undercurrents of certain films. I especially feel this when I watch Malayalam films, and this is a remake of a Mallu film, so that probably explains something! :D

    How interesting about the Malayalam original! Do you remember how Julie died? Was it in childbirth? That version sounds so tragic.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Aha :) Chattakkari ! It was based on Pamman's novel, who would also do a redux in 1976 called Missi with Lakshmi and Mohan again, again based on the Anglo-Indian theme. The movie was much more grounded and less cliche' ridden in its original Malayalam version, with Adoor Bhasi as the endearing dad. You might also want to listen to "Love is just around the Corner" written and sung by Usha Uthup herself - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pDFXKO5GWsk
    My dad was so smitten by Lakshmi and this movie that my sis was named after the movie :) Will write about Chattakkari soon.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Oh I like "Love is Just Around the Corner" so much more than "My Heart is Beating"! Very folksy and charming. :) How interesting about your sister's name! I look forward to your Chattakkari post- very curious about the differences.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I accidentally came to this blog. Found very interesting! Esp. from someone not India born. One of my question is: How did you manage to get such high resolution still photos? Usually when I rent these movies, the copy is pretty bad. I am Indian-American, but don't know the southern languages - Tamil, Malayalam, Telugu, or Kannada.....My mother tongue is Marathi, which has rich movie heritage, the guy who is considered the father of Indian cinema was Dadasaheb Phalke, a Marathi guy, from the state of Maharashtra (Mumbai being a city in it). How about you reviewing Marathi movies??? Thanks.

      Delete
    2. Anon - Hello! The copy of Julie I have is a good print on DVD, but a lot of Indian films in Indian shops or for rent are often illegal copies that are on VCDs or on DVDs in degraded quality (or multiple movies crammed onto one disc, like "2-in-1s"). I did a post a few months back about dance in early Indian cinema, many of which were in Marathi films, that you might be interested in.

      Delete